Your rating: Select ratingGive it 1/5Give it 2/5Give it 3/5Give it 4/5Give it 5/5

Average: 4.5 (2 votes)

Looking from my admittedly narrow vantage point over European public IT procurement, I see today a structural and very fundamental incompatibility between how enterprise IT is expected to be transacted and how open source lends itself to commercial activity.

The symptoms are easy to spot. Take the recent example of the Hungarian government allocating over €40 million to open source. Part of the reason they were forced to such a drastic gesture was that the value of the contract they were putting out to tender was above the threshold set forth in the European directives (in Denmark, I think this is roughly around DKK 1,400,000 or roughly €200,000). Think about that, two hundred thousand euros. With proprietary licensing models, it isn't too difficult to hit that kind of threshold. The threshold is in fact set that high because it has been geared to traditional software procurement, which has been proprietary and expensive enough to suggest a threshold of €200,000.

Your rating: Select ratingGive it 1/5Give it 2/5Give it 3/5Give it 4/5Give it 5/5

Average: 5 (3 votes)

I was privileged to be invited to speak on open source at Videnskabsministeriets IT Arkitekturkonference (The Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation) this last Thursday in Århus. Those who attended my speech at Open Source Days 2008 will know that I have some points but my delivery can be lacking; I managed to overcome that this time with a bit of preparation. A video of the speech is embedded after the jump.

Your rating: Select ratingGive it 1/5Give it 2/5Give it 3/5Give it 4/5Give it 5/5

Average: 4 (1 vote)

Disclaimer: the views expressed in this article are those of Josef Assad and do not necessarily represent the views or position of Rambøll Informatik.

---

The situation of free software in the Danish enterprise is an odd one. Nationally, we sport an awareness level which I would classify as far above international average, and yet adoption rates consistently fail to match this. We know of the free software option, we're just not doing all that much about it (note to self: I could probably reuse that statement in another blog post about my dripping faucet).

This is a bit of an odd situation. If my memory doesn't fail me (which it does frequently enough, natch) then I think it was David Wheeler who pointed out that the classical adoption cycle went something like this:

1. No open source. Everyone's using windows 3.1
2. The IT people hiding out behind the big iron in the mysterious data center discover GNU/Linux and free software
3. 5 to 8 years go by. The IT people grow in open source competence. Their spouses rejoice; no longer must they worry over birthday presents, for anything with a penguin on it will do
4. Management read about Linux and possibly open source in a trade publication. "That's a whole new skillset," they say, dismissing the idea.
5. "Not so!" comes a discordant chorus from behind the big iron. "We've been using open source for 5 years now!"
6. Open source begins permeating the enterprise.
7. IT vendors and entrepreneurs perceive the demand and create open source-based supply.
8. (obligatory) Profit!

Your rating: Select ratingGive it 1/5Give it 2/5Give it 3/5Give it 4/5Give it 5/5

Average: 1.7 (3 votes)

I see you're firing up to 6,000 people. Analysts say you're in more trouble than a pregnant cheerleader, and that you've been that way for a lot longer than nine months. Analysts think you should spin off your hardware business (but then, they thought you should spin off Java back in 2003...) And those are your small problems.

Your rating: Select ratingGive it 1/5Give it 2/5Give it 3/5Give it 4/5Give it 5/5

Average: 3 (1 vote)

I just got back from day 1 of the Open Source Days 2008 conference where I gave a speech entitled "Free Software in the Enterprise: from Use to Community Membership". At this point, I have slept 4 hours in the last 72 so this won't be a long post. I'll just say that the conference organizers have done a brilliant job and I'm glad to have helped fill the speakers roster.

I am also very very happy with the content of my speech (presentation deck uploaded here in this post), but I dread seeing the uploaded video; my delivery was very far below standard. Still, I am happy not to have clogged the conference with yet another generic "business open source" rehash; I think the ideas in mine are solid and quite new.

Again, a pat on the back to the organizers and conference staff. Embedded slideshow after the jump.

Your rating: Select ratingGive it 1/5Give it 2/5Give it 3/5Give it 4/5Give it 5/5

No votes yet

zypper update brought me a kernel update this afternoon, which gave me an intriguing prompt:

      Overall download size: 158.1 M. After the operation, additional 2.2 M will be used.
      Continue? [yes/no]: yes
      kernel patch license:
      This update can be used to install a new kernel.
       
      If you decide to use the kernel update, we recommend that you reboot
      your system upon completion of the YaST Online Update, as additional
      kernel modules may be needed which can only be loaded after the system
      is rebooted.
       
      In order to install this package, you must agree to terms of the above licencse. Continue? [yes/no]:

That I think is as close as one gets in an urxvt window to replicating the windows functionality of prompting for reboots after updates.

I'm not entirely sure how good an idea it is to make the suggestion to reboot in a license exhibit for GPL'ed software. It just doesn't work on so many levels...

Your rating: Select ratingGive it 1/5Give it 2/5Give it 3/5Give it 4/5Give it 5/5

Average: 4 (4 votes)

Here is a neat little application which extends the UNIX at daemon with the XOSD (X on screen display) for very effective, non-blocking, and simple notifications.